spectrogram.m matlab function Search Results


lfp frequency bands  (MathWorks Inc)
98
MathWorks Inc lfp frequency bands
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Lfp Frequency Bands, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lfp frequency bands/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lfp frequency bands - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
wavelet analysis  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc wavelet analysis
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Wavelet Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/wavelet analysis/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
wavelet analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab image processing toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc matlab image processing toolbox
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Matlab Image Processing Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab image processing toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab image processing toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab toolbox eeglab35  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc matlab toolbox eeglab35
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Matlab Toolbox Eeglab35, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab toolbox eeglab35/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab toolbox eeglab35 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
time-locked video eeg monitoring system  (Pinnacle Technology Inc)
90
Pinnacle Technology Inc time-locked video eeg monitoring system
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Time Locked Video Eeg Monitoring System, supplied by Pinnacle Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/time-locked video eeg monitoring system/product/Pinnacle Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
time-locked video eeg monitoring system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
deformation of films  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc deformation of films
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Deformation Of Films, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/deformation of films/product/COMSOL Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
deformation of films - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and LFP features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the LFP frequency bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Journal: APL Bioengineering

Article Title: Degradation-aware neural imputation: Advancing decoding stability in brain machine interfaces

doi: 10.1063/5.0250296

Figure Lengend Snippet: Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and LFP features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the LFP frequency bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Article Snippet: Frequency-spectrum features were widely used for processing LFPs; therefore, LFP raw data were further down-sampled to a 1-kHz sampling rate and converted to power spectral density using a short-time Fourier transform with a Hanning window of 1 f m ms in length and time step of 33-ms, where f m is the minimum frequency of each LFP frequency bands (using the spectrogram function from the Signal Processing Toolbox, MATLAB R2019a, MathWorks).

Techniques: Labeling